Although the video (and sound track) don't really sell me on the idea."
There were some students from the UofM (engineering students,I believe), that wanted to approach Katz with a rapid transit study plan they had conducted in school with the use of this type of technology, but apparently Katz wouldn't take them seriously.
This just goes to show you how closed-minded this city can be, and really is.
BRT will fail miserably if chosen. It's a half-way cop out.
Subways are not right for the task. Winnipeg doesn't need a subway. The only destination dense enough to warrant a subway is downtown itself. That's one stop. Winnipeg needs an LRT that is agile and capable of making multiple stops, running at a high frequency and that can run 24/7.
Subways are massively overkill for the problem at hand.
None!! Fix the roads and then have computers set the timing for traffic to drive, without coming to a red light at the next set of lights! That will improve the drive through time , and Winnipeger's will actually think that they have rapid transport, but for free! That is the perfect answer, FREE!!
<blockquote><cite>Posted By: rosencrentz</cite>None!! Fix the roads and then have computers set the timing for traffic to drive, without coming to a red light at the next set of lights! That will improve the drive through time , and Winnipeger's will actually think that they have rapid transport, but for free! That is the perfect answer, FREE!!</blockquote>
No. Winnipeg deserves better than that cheap solution.
<blockquote><cite>Posted By: rosencrentz</cite>None!! Fix the roads and then have computers set the timing for traffic to drive, without coming to a red light at the next set of lights! That will improve the drive through time , and Winnipeger's will actually think that they have rapid transport, but for free! That is the perfect answer, FREE!!</blockquote> What if/when gas prices reach $2.25 in two years? This is what one analyst was tossing around as a possible scenario. Then driving might really be rapid because there would be at least 20% less cars on the streets.
since when has repairing the infrastructure been for free? Fixing the roads would be very good instead of half assed bandaid patching, but it would take lots of money.
Subway is never going to happen or work in the city. Water Table issues and costs. Bombardier has a nice product line for light transportation called "Flexity", they have provided Minneapolis with their new Light Rail.
<blockquote><cite>Posted By: buflyer</cite>Disclosure: I do not own any Bombardier shares :)</blockquote>Perhaps it's time to buy some. With oil prices going through the roof rapid transit use will grow and grow.
Have a main station downtown. Then a north/south corridor. Garden City mall station to like U of M , with a future consideration for a line to St. Vital Mall. East/West line from Kildonan Place, and perhaps some consideration for a stop in the manufacturing area of Transcona, all the way west to Polo Park. It would work great if the Stadium was still kept out there.
Just think, I mean its a rather simple setup, but it can conceivably hit many major stops along the way in each corridor. All we'd have to do is decide what areas of town to wreck to put in an above ground train bridge so that we won't have to obliterate scores of homes and businesses just to get it started. :D
Map of Minneapolis "Hiawatha Line" Goes from Mall of America to downtown Warehouse District. Transit buses connect with the rail system. Don't we have right of ways with the rail companies for this?
<blockquote><cite>Posted By: pissinginthetent.com</cite>Look, let's cut the crap ! Subway !!!! Warm in the winter , cool in the summer.<div class="ThankfulPeople">Thankful People:<span><a href="http://www.newwinnipeg.com/community/account/430/">conceitedjerk</a>,<a href="http://www.newwinnipeg.com/community/account/1024/">Northlands</a></span></div></blockquote>