Not signed in (Sign In)

Welcome, Guest

Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below

Vanilla 1.1.3 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.

    •  
      CommentAuthorMR_Point
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008
     
    the epic is full of black mold i'm told... ever noticed the sink hole that forumed infront of the doors of it befor they re did the sidewalks?
    •  
      CommentAuthormrchristian
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008 edited
     
    Too bad. The neighbourhood has started regenerating itself into an off-hours kind of place with foot traffic-intensive, "work-live-play" spaces - studios, galleries, cafes. It will be interesting to see if WRHA building helps move that 'grassroots' expansion along or deaden it by dropping a huge office building into it.
    • CommentAuthorrgalston
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008
     
    There was no public discussion on this matter whatsoever.
  1.  
    CV has given the Neon Factory the signs (Starland and Bell).
    Thankful People: mrchristian
    •  
      CommentAuthormrchristian
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008 edited
     
    I took some pics this evening of that strip of Main. <br>
    <br>
    I noticed that the Starland's sign is still full of lightbulbs. Maybe they could light it up one last time ?! <br>
    <br>
    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3209/2348901064_b9c0b6e598.jpg ><br>
    <SM><I>Images:<a href=" http://www.flickr.com/photos/christiansphotos">mrchristian </a> </SM></I><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3282/2348901088_8d63461687.jpg?v=0 ><br>

    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3221/2348908512_10ff9e333d.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <SM><I>Images:<a href=" http://www.flickr.com/photos/christiansphotos">mrchristian </a> </SM></I><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2092/2348901068_02715e0f99.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2032/2348901076_ec5659dfb0.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3098/2348908510_ff3c52d7fb.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <SM><I>Images:<a href=" http://www.flickr.com/photos/christiansphotos">mrchristian </a> </SM></I><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2349/2348908506_7f516a2b2d.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <SM><I>Images:<a href=" http://www.flickr.com/photos/christiansphotos">mrchristian </a> </SM></I><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3059/2348901080_4417f1ea6e.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2090/2348901078_ed1d3a48c1.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2015/2348908518_d320b47206.jpg?v=0><br>
    <SM><I>Images:<a href=" http://www.flickr.com/photos/christiansphotos">mrchristian </a> </SM></I><br>
    Thankful People: StBPegger
  2.  
    Re: The Western Hour

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uUWWaeDyqeo
  3.  
    Good ol' Len Fairchuck !
    •  
      CommentAuthormrchristian
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008 edited
     
  4.  
    Posted By: mrchristianI noticed that the Starland's sign is still full of lightbulbs. Maybe they could light it up one last time ?!


    I hear that the Neon Factory is being allowed to take the sign. A little paint and some new bulbs and it is back in business.

    Nice photos BTW
  5.  
    Thanks ! Nice to hear the signs aren't hitting the dump.
  6.  
    I take back what I said earlier, about the Starland's facade being ugly.

    I had it confused with the Regent.

    My bad :(
    • CommentAuthorEastSider
    • CommentTimeMar 20th 2008
     
    Excellent pics Mr C.........And I'm thrilled to hear the two landmark signs are being saved! BTW Mr C, did you ever find that picture of North Main that had the gap between the Starland and Regent filled? I would love to know what stood between them!
  7.  
    I didn't realize I had done a now and then sort of shot. Top 2008, bottom 1976. Still looking for older ones ! <br>
    <br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2201/2348943442_280d94a6d8.jpg?v=0><br>
    <br>
    <p><img src=http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3238/2349567227_68196581be.jpg?v=0><br>
    <I>UofM Library and Archives Winnipeg Tribune Collection PC 18-2822-024 </I>
  8.  
    This whole thing makes me very sad. I am esspecially a fan of the buildings at Logan and Main. Such a bloody shame. I'm afraid to think of the Winnipeg that will be left to the next generation. <sarcasm>Great job leaders of today!</sarcasm>
  9.  
    There was a recent story on Main Meats in Thursday(?) WFP? Good story on a positive note...
    • CommentAuthorEastSider
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2008
     
    Rats Mr C!! Your 1976 photo still has the gap between the two theatres! Whatever it was must have been torn down a long long time ago! The hunt continues! Thanks so much for taking the time to "fill the gap".
    •  
      CommentAuthormrchristian
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2008 edited
     
    Here's some interesting shots of the Rex - now and then. Looked pretty fab !<br>
    <br>
    The full history can be read in the city historic buildings report at: <a href=http://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/historic/pdf-consv/Main646-long.pdf>http://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/historic/pdf-consv/Main646-long.pdf</a>
    <br>
    In short: Built in 1912 The Rex was the original name, then The Regent in 1923 and in 1978 it became the Epic. I remember that's when it was a XXX theatre. I lived on Burrows in the 80's and I can remember as a kid taking the bus home passing it by. Looking at the interior, man, what a porn theatre it must have been. I would have been getting off starting at the ceiling and walls ! (I assume the barn in front of the screen was from a last performance not a porno !)<br>
    <br>
    Interestingly, a false front was added in 1938. The old one was said to be one of the most splendid in the city. Presumably a lot of upkeep, especially when theatres and cinemas would have been hit hard during the Depression. It was also damaged in the 1950 flood. <br>
    <br>

    <p><img src=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2194/2348943460_381fba1d6d.jpg?v=0><br>
    <p><img src=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2348/2348943466_8df337bb48.jpg?v=0><br>
    <p><img src=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2236/2350567530_85ec8e19e2.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2110/2350567528_2a06b66c93.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    Thankful People: BubberMiley
  10.  
    Okay, a little more on the Rex. Ia am developing a new respect for the place. <br>
    <br>
    It was built NOT as a theatre but as a cinema ("movie house") in 1929 by one of the guys who started the Tribune and ...<br>
    <p><img src=http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2218/2350625022_2e2d657c4c.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <p><img src= http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2209/2350625024_aac0d62112.jpg?v=0 ><br>
    <br>

    I got the quote and the latter pic from a newer addition to the city historic buildings page. It's a scan of a document called "North Main Walking Tour". At 79 pages it's an incredible document that goes building by building from William to the Subway. It appears to be c late 1990s. Too bad it's a reproduction and not a scan of an original as the pics are grainy. It can be found here if anyone wants to walk it before they're all gone: <a href=http://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/historic/pdf/North%20Main%20Walking%20Tour.pdf>thttp://www.winnipeg.ca/ppd/historic/pdf/North%20Main%20Walking%20Tour.pdf</a>
  11.  
    Also, the spec sheet for the Starland Theatre from Centreventure. It appears that they were intending to sell the theatre whole rather than for demolition.<br>
    <br>
    <p><img src= http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3282/2349823473_e1a032430f.jpg?v=0 >
    Thankful People: EastSider
    • CommentAuthorEastSider
    • CommentTimeMar 21st 2008 edited
     
    Wow!! I was not at all concerned about the Epic/Rex/Regent, but to read that and see that interior pic makes me change my mind. I had assumed bothe Starland and Regent were live theatres, had no idea the Regent was built as a movie theatre, and one of the last surviving originals as well. Now I'm twice as disappointed!! One small quibble, your top post says built in 1912, last post says 1929. Can I assume the 1912 date is correct? Not faulting you at all, apologies if ya think I am!